Startup disrupts public transportation by making it worse
Tech entrepreneur Blake Morrison has secured $40 million in venture capital funding for his revolutionary startup “TransitX,” which promises to disrupt urban transportation through an innovative concept he describes as “shared mobility pods operating on fixed routes.” Observers quickly noted that Morrison has essentially reinvented the public bus, stripped it of all efficiency and affordability, and rebranded it as innovation.
“What if we created a system where multiple people share one vehicle traveling predetermined routes?” Morrison pitched to investors, who apparently forgot that buses have existed since 1662. “We’re calling it ‘decentralized communal transport optimization.’ It’s going to change everything.” What it won’t change: the fact that cities already have buses that do this exact thing, but cheaper and without requiring a smartphone app.
TransitX vehicles hold 12 passengers, cost $8 per ride, require advance booking through an app, and only operate in wealthy neighborhoods—essentially combining the worst aspects of public transit and private cars while eliminating all the benefits of either. “We’re not a bus company,” Morrison insisted during a TechCrunch interview. “Buses are for poor people. We’re a luxury mobility solution for professionals who think they’re too good for public transportation but can’t afford their own driver.”
The startup’s business model has confused transportation experts. “They’ve reinvented municipal bus service but made it exponentially more expensive, less accessible, and dependent on technology that will definitely crash during peak hours,” explained urban planner Dr. Sarah Martinez. “It’s impressive, in the way a fire is impressive. Technically an achievement, but probably shouldn’t have happened.”
Morrison’s presentation to investors featured buzzwords like “synergistic route optimization” and “AI-powered passenger coordination,” which translate to “the bus has a schedule” and “people get on and off at stops.” The AI component allegedly determines the most efficient routes, though beta testers report it’s “just a bus route but somehow worse because the algorithm keeps trying to take shortcuts through neighborhoods with speed bumps.”
Public transit advocates have pointed out that cities already have functioning bus systems that TransitX is essentially plagiarizing at higher prices. “This is what happens when tech bros discover public goods and think they invented them,” noted transit activist Marcus Thompson. “Next they’ll ‘disrupt’ libraries by creating a subscription service where you borrow books, or ‘revolutionize’ education by inventing schools. The lack of self-awareness is staggering.”
Morrison dismissed critics as “trapped in outdated thinking about transportation.” He insists TransitX is fundamentally different from buses because “we use an app, we have branding, and our vehicles are white instead of whatever color regular buses are. That’s innovation.” When asked if he’d ever ridden a public bus, Morrison looked confused and said he “doesn’t really do that kind of thing.”
The startup has already faced challenges. Their first vehicle broke down on day one because Morrison insisted on replacing standard bus parts with “proprietary smart components” that cost ten times more and work half as well. Their app crashed during launch, leaving passengers stranded. And their “premium route optimization AI” routed a vehicle through a farmers market, causing what witnesses described as “chaos involving angry vendors and a loose chicken.”
Despite these setbacks, investors remain bullish on TransitX. “Blake has vision,” explained venture capitalist Jennifer Walsh. “He saw something everyone uses every day and asked ‘what if we made this worse and more expensive?’ That’s the kind of outside-the-box thinking that defines Silicon Valley.” When asked if she’d personally use TransitX instead of her private driver, Walsh laughed for 30 seconds straight before declining to comment.
Morrison announced plans to expand TransitX to 50 cities, pending regulatory approval from transportation authorities who are presumably still trying to understand why they should license a worse version of buses that already exist.
SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/silicon-valley-genius-reinvents-bus-calls-it-innovation/
SOURCE: Silicon Valley Genius Reinvents Bus, Calls It Innovation (https://bohiney.com/silicon-valley-genius-reinvents-bus-calls-it-innovation/)

by