October 29, 2025

Pedestrian Traffic Lights Confuse Citizens

New Walk Signals Too Complex, City Admits

The Department of Transportation’s attempt to modernize pedestrian crossing signals in downtown Riverside has resulted in widespread confusion, seventeen minor accidents, and a 74-year-old man who’s been standing at the same intersection for three days trying to decode what the lights mean and whether he’s having a stroke. The new “intuitive” system, which cost taxpayers $2.3 million that could have fixed literally any other problem, features animated displays, countdown timers, audio cues, and symbols that apparently require an engineering degree and possibly psychic abilities to interpret.

City traffic engineer Donald Park confidently unveiled the system last month, describing it as “user-friendly technology designed for the 21st century pedestrian who we assume is much smarter than they actually are.” In practice, the signals have created such chaos that the city has stationed crossing guards at major intersections—essentially recreating the system that existed before traffic lights were invented and admitting defeat in the most expensive way possible. “We wanted to make crossing safer and clearer,” Park admitted during a damage control press conference, “but we may have overthought this to a degree that suggests we should all be fired.”

The problems began immediately when citizens encountered the first intersection. Instead of the traditional walking person and hand symbols that have worked fine since forever, the new system displays a progressive sequence of animated figures performing increasingly complex movements, accompanied by beeps, chimes, and what several pedestrians swear sounds like “a didgeridoo having an existential crisis.” Local LGBTQ+ residents noted that the dancing figures bear suspicious resemblance to bad interpretive dance they’ve seen at too many pride festivals, which at least makes them culturally inclusive if completely useless.

“I have two master’s degrees and I can’t figure out when it’s safe to cross,” complained resident Margaret Chen. “Is the little guy doing jumping jacks a walk signal or a warning? Why is he moonwalking? What does the purple light mean? Why is there interpretive dance happening on a traffic signal?” The city has released a twelve-page instruction manual explaining the signals, which they acknowledge defeats the entire purpose of having intuitive signals in the first place but at least keeps the printing company in business.

Most concerning is the audio component, which was meant to assist visually impaired pedestrians but instead creates a cacophony that accessibility experts describe as “aggressively unhelpful” and “possibly a hate crime against ears.” The system announces crossing instructions in six languages simultaneously, plays nature sounds for reasons nobody can explain, and at one intersection inexplicably quotes Shakespeare while featuring what sounds like a drag queen doing voice-over work. Blind residents report the old system of simple beeping worked considerably better and didn’t make them question their sanity.

The city council has called emergency meetings to address the disaster, with several members suggesting the radical solution of “going back to the simple lights that worked fine and didn’t cost $2.3 million.” Mayor Thompson resists, insisting the system just needs “minor adjustments and a six-month public education campaign” to teach citizens how to cross streets, a skill most learned around age five. Meanwhile, rideshare drivers report that nobody in Riverside knows how to cross streets anymore, pedestrian traffic has slowed by 40%, and the man at Fifth and Main is still standing there, determined to understand the signals before attempting to cross. The city has dispatched a wellness check and possibly an exorcist.

SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/pedestrian-traffic-lights-confuse-citizens/

SOURCE: Pedestrian Traffic Lights Confuse Citizens (https://bohiney.com/pedestrian-traffic-lights-confuse-citizens/)

New Walk Signals Too Complex, City Admits - Pedestrian Traffic Lights Confuse Citizens
New Walk Signals Too Complex, City Admits

Beth Newell

Beth Newell was born in a small Texas town where the church bulletin often read like unintentional comedy. After attending a Texas public university, she set her sights on Washington, D.C., where she sharpened her pen into a tool equal parts humor and critique. As a satirist and journalist, Newell has been recognized for her ability to turn political jargon into punchlines without losing sight of the underlying stakes. Her essays and columns appear in Dublin Opinion’s sister outlets and U.S. literary journals, while her commentary has been featured on media panels examining satire as civic engagement. Blending Texas storytelling grit with D.C.’s high-stakes theatrics, Newell is lauded for satire that informs as it entertains. She stands as an authoritative voice on how humor exposes power, hypocrisy, and the cultural blind spots of American politics.

View all posts by Beth Newell →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *